CruxBit
Back to catalog
EasyTechnologyeducation

Regression and Classification Metrics Dashboard for Model Evaluation

Added Jun 2025 3 design docs

Model evaluation is where data science becomes accountable: a single accuracy number hides more than it reveals, and practitioners need fluency across regression and classification metrics to judge a model honestly. This project builds the tool that makes those metrics concrete and comparable.

The intern creates a Streamlit dashboard where users upload model predictions alongside true values and instantly receive the appropriate evaluation suite. For regression tasks the app computes MAE, MSE, and R-squared with pandas and scikit-learn, pairing the numbers with plots that show how errors are distributed; for classification it renders an annotated confusion matrix and derived metrics so users can see exactly where a model confuses one class for another. The dashboard validates uploads gracefully before computing anything, handling mismatched lengths and malformed files the way a real tool must.

The project drills the vocabulary every data scientist is tested on — what each metric measures, when it misleads, and how to read a confusion matrix at a glance — while giving the intern experience building a small, genuinely reusable analytics utility they can point at the outputs of any future model.

Related projects

You might also like

TechnologyMedium

Prompt Template Design and Testing Workbench for Educators

Teachers and instructional designers increasingly build AI-driven learning modules, such as quiz generators, explanation assistants, and feedback tools, and every one of them lives or dies by its prompts. Yet educators typically iterate on prompts by trial and error in a chat window, with no way to save what worked, compare variations, or enforce consistent output formats. Prompt engineering needs a workbench, the way code has an IDE. The intern builds that workbench as a Streamlit application in Python, using LangChain as the engine. The tool lets users create parameterized prompt templates with variables such as subject, difficulty, and student level; run them against OpenAI models; and compare outputs across template variations side by side. Output parsers enforce structured results, so a quiz template reliably yields well-formed questions and answers rather than loose prose, and chain sequencing lets users compose multi-step flows in which one prompt's output feeds the next, mirroring how real learning modules are assembled. The intern implements template storage, the comparison runner, and the parser configuration interface. The project demonstrates systematic prompt engineering as a discipline: template design, structured output enforcement, chain composition, and building a tool that turns an ad hoc craft into a repeatable process for a non-technical audience.

educationgenerative-ailangchainopenai+2
PRD · HLD · LLD includedView